Access Bank Plc has debunked a viral video on social media alleging {that a} buyer’s N500 million was lacking from the financial institution.
Whereas describing the allegation as “unfaithful” and “baseless”, the financial institution in an announcement launched on Sunday additionally denied claims of unethical habits by its employees.
A social media influencer, Martins Otse, popularly generally known as VeryDarkMan, had over the weekend known as out Access Bank alleging that the household of a deceased buyer couldn’t retrieve the sum of N500 million left in his checking account as a result of the cash was lacking.
In keeping with him, the deceased on his deathbed had knowledgeable his household about numerous accounts financial institution accounts the place he had cash and the quantity, together with an Entry account with N500 million.
What the financial institution is saying
Reacting to the video, which has gone viral on social media, particularly, on X, previously generally known as Twitter, Access Bank stated:
“Our consideration has been drawn to a video on social media whereby allegations of lacking funds and unethical behaviour have been made towards Access Bank Plc.
At first, we want to emphasize that the protection and safety of our clients’ funds are core priorities which we take critically. Second, Access Bank Plc doesn’t have interaction in or condone any unethical behaviour.
“Within the immediate case, the allegations of lacking funds within the Bank are most unfaithful and baseless.
“There is no such thing as a N500 million or every other fund or quantity lacking from the topic buyer’s account or from every other buyer’s account with us.
- The financial institution added that it had along with different unbiased stakeholders within the banking trade completely investigated the allegations and independently arrived on the identical conclusions.
- Access Bank insisted that it operates with the best moral requirements, including that it might proceed to guard its clients’ pursuits while additionally respecting privateness legal guidelines.
“Consequently, while we have now engaged and can proceed to interact with our clients, we should advise the general public to not depend on or consider sensational and unverified claims which can be designed to titillate and mislead the general public.”
Influencer faults financial institution’s response
Nevertheless, the social media influencer, Otse, faulted Access Bank’s response saying the financial institution nonetheless has some explanations to do.
Reacting to the financial institution’s assertion, he wrote:
“I simply noticed your response to the allegations of the lacking 500 million naira from a lifeless consumer account. My first query to Access Bank is, why did the financial institution assertion skip from 2016 to 2020? The place are the statements of 2017, 2018, and 2019?”
The argument on the allegations could also be removed from over as extra social media customers and clients proceed to pull the financial institution regardless of its assertion setting the data straight.
Be First to Comment